Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Classical statistical genetics theory defines dominance as any deviation from a purely additive, or dosage, effect of a genotype on a trait, which is known as the dominance deviation. Dominance is well documented in plant and animal breeding. Outside of rare monogenic traits, however, evidence in humans is limited. We systematically examined common genetic variation across 1060 traits in a large population cohort (UK Biobank, N = 361,194 samples analyzed) for evidence of dominance effects. We then developed a computationally efficient method to rapidly assess the aggregate contribution of dominance deviations to heritability. Lastly, observing that dominance associations are inherently less correlated between sites at a genomic locus than their additive counterparts, we explored whether they may be leveraged to identify causal variants more confidently.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1126/science.abn8455

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2023-03-31T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

379

Pages

1341 - 1348

Total pages

7

Keywords

Animals, Humans, Biological Specimen Banks, Breeding, Genetic Variation, Genotype, Models, Genetic, Phenotype, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, United Kingdom, Genes, Dominant, Multifactorial Inheritance