Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Parental consent to children's participation in vaccine research has resulted in the licensure of essential vaccines. Recruitment to this type of research is typically difficult, however, and many parents decline. In this study, the authors interviewed parents about their decision for or against enrolling their child in a vaccine study. The data analysis suggests that parents' ability to evaluate a vaccine study depends on how attuned they are with science and medicine, either professionally or as consumers of health services. Familiarity does not predispose parents to enrolling their child in research; rather, it is a predictor of parents' confidence in their decision making. Many parents were motivated by altruism and trust, which, if uninformed, can leave the parents prone to exploitation. It is vital to ensure that parents are confident in their judgment of a study and its potential benefit to their child and society.

Original publication

DOI

10.1177/1049732306298561

Type

Journal article

Journal

Qual Health Res

Publication Date

03/2007

Volume

17

Pages

311 - 322

Keywords

Attitude to Health, Biomedical Research, Child, Preschool, Decision Making, Diphtheria Toxoid, Humans, Motivation, Parents, Perception, Pneumococcal Vaccines, Qualitative Research, Recognition (Psychology), Research Subjects, Vaccines